[Click] RE: 2.6 Kernel Patch for Click 1.4.3

[Eddie Kohler]

That's a pretty neat graph to have around! :)

E

On Feb 1, 2005, at 5:07 PM, Brecht Vermeulen wrote:

>
> Dear Beyers,
>
> I did some early performance comparison between 2.6.0-test6 and click  
> polling on a dual CPU system, see attachment.
>
> I know: ancient kernel, ancient hardware, ancient click (I think about  
> 1.5 years ago). I don't know about the situation now.
>
> best regards,
> Brecht
>
> Beyers Cronje wrote:
>
>> On the same note, has anyone done studies on performance of
>> NAPI polling vs Click polling ?
>> On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:08:34 -0000
>>  "Ross C Mcilroy" <mcilrorc at dcs.gla.ac.uk> wrote:
>>> I forgot to mention, I've not added the click polling
>>> support to the
>>> kernel patch.  I had no need for this myself, and thought
>>> that there
>>> would be different options with NAPI support for polling.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Ross
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> click mailing list
>>> click at amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu
>>> https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>> For super low premiums, click here http://www.dialdirect.co.za/quote
>> _______________________________________________
>> click mailing list
>> click at amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu
>> https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click
> <click_polling_vs_napi.pdf>____________________________________________ 
> ___
> click mailing list
> click at amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu
> https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click