[Click] RE: 2.6 Kernel Patch for Click 1.4.3

[Giorgio Calarco]

you can take a look at the acts of the
last QOSIP conference on Lecture Notes
on Computer Science Vol.n.3375, there is a session
dedicated to software routers where
you can find a couple of papers about that.

ciao
giorgio


----------------------------------
Ing. Giorgio Calarco
Università di Bologna - Polo di Ravenna
Cat. EP1 - Area Tecnica
Via Baccarini, 27 - 48100 Ravenna
email: giorgio.calarco at unibo.it



Scrive Brecht Vermeulen <brecht.vermeulen at ugent.be>:

>
> Dear Beyers,
>
> I did some early performance comparison between 2.6.0-test6 and click
> polling on a dual CPU system, see attachment.
>
> I know: ancient kernel, ancient hardware, ancient click (I think about
> 1.5 years ago). I don't know about the situation now.
>
> best regards,
> Brecht
>
> Beyers Cronje wrote:
>
> > On the same note, has anyone done studies on performance of
> > NAPI polling vs Click polling ?
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:08:34 -0000
> >  "Ross C Mcilroy" <mcilrorc at dcs.gla.ac.uk> wrote:
> >
> >>I forgot to mention, I've not added the click polling
> >>support to the
> >>kernel patch.  I had no need for this myself, and thought
> >>that there
> >>would be different options with NAPI support for polling.
> >>
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>
> >>Ross
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>click mailing list
> >>click at amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu
> >>https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click
> >
> >
> > _____________________________________________________________________
> > For super low premiums, click here http://www.dialdirect.co.za/quote
> > _______________________________________________
> > click mailing list
> > click at amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu
> > https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click
>


----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.