[Click] RE: 2.6 Kernel Patch for Click 1.4.3

[Brecht Vermeulen]

Dear Beyers,

I did some early performance comparison between 2.6.0-test6 and click 
polling on a dual CPU system, see attachment.

I know: ancient kernel, ancient hardware, ancient click (I think about 
1.5 years ago). I don't know about the situation now.

best regards,
Brecht

Beyers Cronje wrote:

> On the same note, has anyone done studies on performance of
> NAPI polling vs Click polling ?
> 
> 
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:08:34 -0000
>  "Ross C Mcilroy" <mcilrorc at dcs.gla.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
>>I forgot to mention, I've not added the click polling
>>support to the
>>kernel patch.  I had no need for this myself, and thought
>>that there
>>would be different options with NAPI support for polling.
>>
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Ross
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>click mailing list
>>click at amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu
>>https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click
> 
> 
> _____________________________________________________________________
> For super low premiums, click here http://www.dialdirect.co.za/quote
> _______________________________________________
> click mailing list
> click at amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu
> https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: click_polling_vs_napi.pdf
Type: c
Size: 109569 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/pipermail/click/attachments/20050202/9cf1e654/click_polling_vs_napi-0001.ksh