[Click] Re: [Roofnet] click.roofnet statically compiled

[John Bicket]

Hi Andrea,

Here is what I run configure with to run on our nodes without glibc:
/home/am5/jbicket/co/click/configure --enable-userlevel --enable-wifi --disable-linuxmodule --enable-tools=no CXXFLAGS=-static

Let me know how that works.

I'm not sure if --enable-static and --disable-shared work.. Maybe someone knows on the click list.

--john

Andrea Marasco [marasco3000 at yahoo.com] wrote:
>Thanks John,
> 
>I compiled click but I am having some portability problems due to shared library. I noticed that your executable click.roofnet is compiled statically.
> 
>I tried to compiled click with no shared libraries running
> 
>./configure --disable-sahred --enalbe-static --target=i386-pc-linux-gnu  --prefix=/roof-distr-directory --enable-userlevel --enable-wifi --disable-linuxmodule
>
>and than running
> 
>gmake all
> 
>However, the executable I get still needs some shared libraries from my host distribution. Could you please tell me what options you use to compile statically the executable for the roofnet distribution?
> 
>Thanks,
> 
>Andrea
> 
>
>John Bicket <jbicket at amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu> wrote:
>We get the same huge binary - if you run "strip" on the binary, it'll 
>be less than 2 megs.
>
>Thanks for the fix - I checked it in.
>
>--john
>
>
>Andrea Marasco [marasco3000 at yahoo.com] wrote:
>>Thanks John,
>>
>>now it works great!
>>
>>Compiling click from source I got an executable file 
>>CLICKDIR/userlevel/click of 14 MB that it is much
>>bigger than bin/click.roofnet in the tarball (just
>>1.7MB). Could you please explain me how I can compile
>>click from source and get the smaller version of the
>>executable?
>>
>>Thanks for you help.
>>
>>Andrea
>>
>>
>>P.S.
>>
>>Check scripts/Roofnet.pm line 200, you are missing a
>>$gw_ad in the return statement.
>>It should be like this:
>>return ($gw_dev, $gw_ip, $gw_nm, $gw_gw, $gw_ad,
>>$download_cap, $upload_cap);
>>
>>--- John Bicket wrote:
>>
>>> 
>>> Hi Andrea,
>>> Andrea Marasco [marasco3000 at yahoo.com] wrote:
>>> >Hi,
>>> >
>>> >I upgraded to your latest tarball. The nodes work.
>>> I
>>> >am able to ping other nodes and ssh into them.
>>> >However, the /click directory is completely empty.
>>> >Therefore, I am not able to look at the routing
>>> table,
>>> >etc...
>>> >
>>> >Do you have any idea why that might happen?
>>> 
>>> This is because we're running at userlevel now - we
>>> use the scripts
>>> /home/roofnet/scripts/read_handler.pl and 
>>> '' write_handler.pl
>>> to access the handlers that were in click.
>>> (for instance, we run 
>>> read_handler.pl srcr/es.bcast_stats 
>>> to look at neighbor info and
>>> read_handler.pl srcr/lt.routes
>>> for the routes).
>>> 
>>> 
>>> You can also just telnet to port 7777 for an
>>> interactive session with the
>>> ControlSocket.
>>> 
>>> >
>>> >Moreover, I think you should take a look at
>>> >find_srcr.pl. In my case the 5.x.x.x device is
>>> tun0
>>> >that is not in the search space of find_srcr.pl.
>>> 
>>> I just fixed this. Thanks for letting us know.
>>> 
>>> >
>>> >Thanks,
>>> >
>>> >Andrea
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >__________________________________________________
>>> >Do You Yahoo!?
>>> >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
>>> protection around 
>>> >http://mail.yahoo.com 
>>> 
>>
>>
>> 
>>__________________________________ 
>>Do you Yahoo!? 
>>Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. 
>>www.yahoo.com 
>> 
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
>http://mail.yahoo.com