[Click] Linux 2.6.24.7 patch in

[Eddie Kohler]

Kevin,

I have since had the chance to verify that the current proclikefs/kernel 
module combination successfully uninstalls, without patching click-uninstall, 
on a 32-bit kernel.  Do you always get a GPF when unloading, or do packets 
have to be going through the router?

Eddie


springbo at cs.wisc.edu wrote:
> Thanks Eddie!
> 
> I've run into a couple complications:
> 1) It looks like there is a logic error in Packet::has_network_header().
> I've attached a patch.
> 
> 2) click-uninstall'ing the kernel module results in a general protection
> fault. My configure string is  "./configure --enable-multithread
> --enable-user-multithread --enable-adaptive --enable-intel-cpu CFLAGS=-g
> CXXFLAGS=-g". I am building on an x86_64 machine. The click configuration
> used or the number of threads doesn't seem to affect the problem. See
> gpf.log for more information.
> 
> 3) I'm getting warnings when click descends into the kernel source
> directory to build the module. See warning.log. My guess is that this is
> due to the improved linuxmodule build process.
> 
> Polling seems to be working with the e1000-7.6.15.5 driver.
> 
> Thanks again,
> Kevin Springborn
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Click has been updated with the patch for Linux 2.6.24.7 support; and the
>> Linux 2.6.24.7 patch has been checked into the Click repository.  Please
>> let
>> us know if all of this works.  I would love to hear working or not working
>> reports from users.
>>
>> Thanks very much to, especially, Adam Greenhalgh, Joonwoo Park, and Nemean
>> Networks for putting together this patch.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Eddie
>> _______________________________________________
>> click mailing list
>> click at amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu
>> https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click
>>