[Click] 64-bit platform query

[Jonathan Day]

Hi,

Yes, I'm using 1.5. I'm downloading the CVS files as I
type, to see if those work better. I guess I should
specify a little more precisely. I'm compiling on a
Broadcom BCM1250 (a dual-core system based on the SB1,
which is a processor based on version 0.95 of the
64bit MIPS specification).

This is a notoriously evil platform, so it is hard to
determine which problems lie in the Click code and
which lie in a CPU that surely must constitute cruel
and unusual punishment toards programmers.

I am also going to do some tests to see if it is a
problem in the options I selected, so I can give a
more useful report on what the problem is, now that
it's clear that 64-bit platforms are working.

Jonathan

--- Bart Braem <bart.braem at ua.ac.be> wrote:

> On Thursday 15 June 2006 01:28, Jonathan Day wrote:
> > Does anyone have a set of patches to make Click
> 64-bit
> > clean? If not, does anyone have any suggestions on
> how
> > I could fix the type length issues without
> breaking
> > any of the requirements of Click?
> 
> Are you sure you are using the latest version of
> Click (at least 1.5 or even 
> better CVS)? There have been reports on this list of
> Click running on 64 bit 
> and there are certainly fixes in the Click source...
> 
> Bart
> -- 
> Bart Braem
> PATS research group
> Dept. of Mathematics and Computer Sciences
> University of Antwerp
> G2.36, Building G
> Middelheimlaan 1
> 2020 Antwerpen, Belgium
> Phone: +32 (0)3 265.35.19.
> Fax: +32 (0)3 265.37.77.
> Web: www.pats.ua.ac.be
> > _______________________________________________
> click mailing list
> click at amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu
> https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com