[Click] 回复： Re: about bug on addressinfo element

[徐晖]

Thank you for your reply，click is really a wonderful project，it make my
research much easier,thanks again.
Another problem,at prism2decap.cc Prism2Decap::simple_action(Packet *p)
function,shuld we have to add ceh->magic = WIFI_EXTRA_MAGIC ?
So far as I know madwifi will check the packet header to ensure if there are
other extra header such as Prism2 headers,Radiotap headers and Atheros
Descriptors,at click there are corresponding elemets,but what is the
ExtraEncap/Decap elment using for?

2010/10/17 Eddie Kohler <kohler at cs.ucla.edu>

> Actually, I gave this some more thought, and I think you're right that the
> previous behavior was unexpected and lame.
>
> Does this commit improve things?:
>
>
> http://github.com/kohler/click/commit/be466dc3b676b1d7069a996ac1fdff5720a17160
>
> Eddie
>
>
>
>
> On 01/29/2012 07:19 PM, xuhui122000 at gmail.com wrote:
>
>> the access-point.click is an sample at cof/wifi ,i think files at cof/wifi
>> should been updated 徐晖
>>
>> 原信息
>> 主题： Re: [Click] about bug on addressinfo element
>> 发件人：<rchertov at cs.ucsb.edu>
>>
>


-- 
徐晖