[Click] Race condition with FullNoteQueue signaling in multithreading
Eddie Kohler
kohler at cs.ucla.edu
Wed Oct 13 11:06:33 EDT 2010
Hi Beyers!
I am not sure that I agree with your analysis about the queue getting "stuck."
Here is the configuration I used, a tweak of yours:
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
is1::InfiniteSource(DATA \<00 00 c0 ae 67 ef 00 00 00 00 00 00 08 00>,
LIMIT -1, STOP false) -> q1::FullNoteQueue -> uq1::Unqueue -> Discard;
is2::InfiniteSource(DATA \<00 00 c0 ae 67 ef 00 00 00 00 00 00 08 00>,
LIMIT -1, STOP false) -> q2::FullNoteQueue -> uq2::Unqueue -> Discard;
StaticThreadSched(is1 0, uq1 1, is2 2, uq2 3);
Script(TYPE ACTIVE,
init x 0,
set x $(add $x 1),
goto foo $(or $(is1.scheduled) $(uq1.scheduled)),
print "$x: is1.scheduled false, uq1.scheduled false, q1.length $(q1.length)",
label foo,
goto bar $(or $(is2.scheduled) $(uq2.scheduled)),
print "$x: is2.scheduled false, uq2.scheduled false, q2.length $(q2.length)",
label bar,
wait 0.5s,
loop);
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
This should print a message whenever neither source nor sink is scheduled.
I also tried this with "FullNoteQueue" replaced with "ThreadSafeQueue."
If a queue was truly getting 'stuck,' we would expect to see something like
745: is1.scheduled false, uq1.scheduled false
746: is1.scheduled false, uq1.scheduled false
747: is1.scheduled false, uq1.scheduled false
748: is1.scheduled false, uq1.scheduled false
749: is1.scheduled false, uq1.scheduled false....
with no gaps, because something would go unscheduled *and stay that way*.
But that's not what I see. I see this:
1: is1.scheduled false, uq1.scheduled false, q1.length 17
1: is2.scheduled false, uq2.scheduled false, q2.length 0
20: is1.scheduled false, uq1.scheduled false, q1.length 14
22: is1.scheduled false, uq1.scheduled false, q1.length 0
28: is1.scheduled false, uq1.scheduled false, q1.length 14
41: is1.scheduled false, uq1.scheduled false, q1.length 0
47: is2.scheduled false, uq2.scheduled false, q2.length 0
55: is2.scheduled false, uq2.scheduled false, q2.length 0
56: is2.scheduled false, uq2.scheduled false, q2.length 0
76: is2.scheduled false, uq2.scheduled false, q2.length 0
*** Now this, on the other hand, I would expect. In a multithreaded
environment, notification will cause some delay between the upstream &
downstream sides of a queue. This is because the upstream side must wake up
the downstream side, or vice versa. The cross-thread communication required
for this can happen a bit slowly, leaving a moment (maybe more than a moment)
where neither task appears to be scheduled. (In fact, at least one of the
tasks will be "pre-scheduled.")
So my questions for you are this. Did you really mean "stuck"? Have you
verified that the tasks NEVER re-schedule themselves? Do you agree with my
analysis? Or, are you saying that the "pauses" are too long, even though the
tasks do reschedule themselves?
Eddie
On 10/12/2010 05:23 PM, Beyers Cronje wrote:
> Hi Eddie, list,
>
> I've come across a multithreading bug in queue signal handling which I can
> reproduce fairly consistently with userlevel multithreading Click. The
> symptoms are that either the upstream or downstream task from the queue are
> unscheduled even though the notifier signal is active, this occurs when the
> queue either becomes full or empty. To illustrate here is the config I use
> and some debug handler outputs:
>
> //******************** Config ************************
> is1::InfiniteSource(DATA \<00 00 c0 ae 67 ef 00 00 00 00 00 00 08 00>,
> LIMIT 1000, STOP false) -> ThreadSafeQueue -> uq1::Unqueue -> Discard;
> is2::InfiniteSource(DATA \<00 00 c0 ae 67 ef 00 00 00 00 00 00 08 00>,
> LIMIT -1, STOP false) -> q::ThreadSafeQueue -> uq2::Unqueue -> Discard;
>
> StaticThreadSched(is1 0, uq1 1, is2 2, uq2 3);
>
>
> //******************** Debug Handler Output when upstream push task is stuck
> ************************
> read q.length
> 200 Read handler 'q.length' OK
> DATA 1
> 0
>
> read q.fullnote_state
> 200 Read handler 'q.fullnote_state' OK
> DATA 131
> empty notifier off
> task 0x25b8830 [uq2 :: Unqueue] unscheduled
> full notifier on
> task 0x25b8350 [is2 :: InfiniteSource] unscheduled
>
> //******************** Debug Handler Output when downstream pull task is
> stuck ************************
> read q.length
> 200 Read handler 'q.length' OK
> DATA 4
> 1000
>
> read q.fullnote_state
> 200 Read handler 'q.fullnote_state' OK
> DATA 131
> empty notifier on
> task 0x1c6f830 [uq2 :: Unqueue] unscheduled
> full notifier off
> task 0x1c6f350 [is2 :: InfiniteSource] unscheduled
>
> //*****************************************************************************************************************
>
> Clearly the notifier states are correct, but somehow the relevant task is
> not rescheduled. The above config uses ThreadSafeQueue but I verified that
> the same issue occurs when using FullNoteQueue.
> The obvious places to look are
> ActiveNotifier::set_active,FullNoteQueue::push_success/push_failure/pull_success/pull_failure
> but so far I haven't spotted anything wrong with the relevant code, clearly
> I'm overlooking something.
>
> Have you or anyone else on the list got any suggestions?
>
> If it helps, I'm running click source from a couple of weeks back, default
> 64bit Fedora Core 13 kernel with preemption enabled
> (2.6.33.3-85.fc13.x86_64 ), Intel Dual-Core CPU.
> I start userlevel click with the following command: 'click --threads=4
> conf/threadtest.click -p 777'
>
> Cheers
>
> Beyers
> _______________________________________________
> click mailing list
> click at amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu
> https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click
More information about the click
mailing list