[Click] distributed source control

[Eddie Kohler]

Hey Adam,

No Authentication.  That is more work for me.  Thus, git!

Eddie


Adam Greenhalgh wrote:
> Eddie,
> 
> I'd suggest picking something like subversion and letting users create
> there own branches, the wiki password you are using could be used as
> authentication.
> 
> Just my 2c.
> 
> As Beyers' says thanks again for click.
> 
> Adam
> 
> On 7/5/07, Beyers Cronje <bcronje at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm happy either way. The public branches sound like a good idea. I heard
>> git can get quite complex, so I hope I would not have to read a "Do you
>> first commit with git in 21 days" book just to get started :)
>>
>> Thanks again for Click.
>>
>> Beyers
>>
>> On 7/5/07, Eddie Kohler <kohler at cs.ucla.edu> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I would like to move away from Click's current anonymous CVS based
>>> development model to a distributed source control system.  This would
>>> let people maintain public branches of their own.  I am leaning towards
>>> "git", the tool originally developed for Linux.
>>>
>>> http://git.or.cz/
>>>
>>> Any complaints or comments?  Speak now!
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Eddie
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> click mailing list
>>> click at amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu
>>> https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> click mailing list
>> click at amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu
>> https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click
>>
> _______________________________________________
> click mailing list
> click at amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu
> https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click