[Click] RE: 2.6 Kernel Patch for Click 1.4.3
Beyers Cronje
bcronje at cs.co.za
Thu Feb 3 07:48:05 EST 2005
Thanks Brecht!
-----Original Message-----
From: click-bounces at amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu
[mailto:click-bounces at amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu]On Behalf Of Brecht
Vermeulen
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 3:07 AM
To: Beyers Cronje
Cc: click at amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [Click] RE: 2.6 Kernel Patch for Click 1.4.3
Dear Beyers,
I did some early performance comparison between 2.6.0-test6 and click
polling on a dual CPU system, see attachment.
I know: ancient kernel, ancient hardware, ancient click (I think about
1.5 years ago). I don't know about the situation now.
best regards,
Brecht
Beyers Cronje wrote:
> On the same note, has anyone done studies on performance of
> NAPI polling vs Click polling ?
>
>
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:08:34 -0000
> "Ross C Mcilroy" <mcilrorc at dcs.gla.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>>I forgot to mention, I've not added the click polling
>>support to the
>>kernel patch. I had no need for this myself, and thought
>>that there
>>would be different options with NAPI support for polling.
>>
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Ross
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>click mailing list
>>click at amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu
>>https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click
>
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> For super low premiums, click here http://www.dialdirect.co.za/quote
> _______________________________________________
> click mailing list
> click at amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu
> https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click
This is an email from Bytes Technology Group. It is confidential to the
ordinary user of the email address to which it is addressed
and may contain copyright and/or legally privileged information.
No one else may read, print, store, copy, forward or act in
reliance upon all or any part of it or its attachments. If you
received this email in error please notify its sender.
More information about the click
mailing list