[Click] Queue Capacity and RatedUnqueue
Eddie Kohler
kohler at cs.ucla.edu
Fri Jun 18 22:18:50 EDT 2004
Giovanni,
Do you still get drops with a simple "Unqueue" (not RatedUnqueue)?
The rate on that RatedUnqueue is pretty slow: 200,000 packets per second. It's
not surprising that your traffic generators can generate more load than that.
Eddie
Giovanni Giardinelli wrote:
> Hi Eddie,
>
> I use three ethernet Gbit
>
> In order to generate packets, I use the element FastUDPSource.
>
> tester's configuration is the following:
>
> src2::FastUDPSource (204800,8192000,64,00:30:48:28:ba:28,192.168.10.145,
> 1234,00:30:48:28:ba:ae,192.168.10.209,1234)
> -> SetIPDSCP(46)
> -> ToDevice(eth2);
>
> src3::FastUDPSource (20000,800000,64,00:30:48:28:ba:29,192.168.10.225,
> 1234,00:30:48:28:ba:af,192.168.10.209,1234)
> -> SetIPDSCP(0)
> -> ToDevice(eth3);
>
> FromDevice(eth0)
> -> c0 :: Classifier(12/0806 20/0001,-);
>
> c0[0]
> -> ar0 :: ARPResponder(192.168.10.209 00:07:e9:1f:b2:50)
> -> SimpleQueue
> -> ToDevice(eth0);
>
> c0[1]
> -> cf0:: Counter()
> -> Discard();
>
>
> The principal part of the configuration of the Router is the following:
>
> c0 :: Classifier(12/0806 20/0001,
> 12/0806 20/0002,
> 12/0800,
> -);
>
> c2 :: Classifier(12/0806 20/0001,
> 12/0806 20/0002,
> 12/0800,
> -);
>
> c3 :: Classifier(12/0806 20/0001,
> 12/0806 20/0002,
> 12/0800,
> -);
>
> src0 :: PollDevice(eth0)
> -> [0]c0;
> src2 :: PollDevice(eth2)
> -> [0]c2;
> src3 :: PollDevice(eth3)
> -> [0]c3;
>
> .............
> .............
> .............
>
> c2[2]
> -> Paint(3)
> -> Strip(14)
> -> CheckIPHeader(1.255.255.255)
> -> ipc2 :: IPClassifier(ip dscp 46, ip dscp 0);
>
> c3[2]
> -> Paint(4)
> -> Strip(14)
> -> CheckIPHeader(1.255.255.255)
> -> ipc3 :: IPClassifier(ip dscp 46, ip dscp 0);
>
> qef :: SimpleQueue(32000);
>
> ipc2[0]
> -> qef;
>
> qef
> -> RatedUnqueue(204800)
> -> rt;
>
> ...........
> ...........
> ...........
>
> PokeHandlers( wait 5,
> read qef.length,
> read qef.droppes
> loop
> )
>
>
> The qef.lenght=32000
>
> the qef.droppes increases in continuation
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Giovanni
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eddie Kohler" <kohler at CS.UCLA.EDU>
> To: "Giovanni Giardinelli" <giovanni.giardinelli at tin.it>
> Cc: <click at amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
> Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 11:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [Click] Queue Capacity and RatedUnqueue
>
>
>
>>Giovanni
>>
>>Please send a more complete configuration. What are you using to
>>generate packets?
>>
>>
>>Eddie
>>
>>On Jun 18, 2004, at 2:06 PM, Giovanni Giardinelli wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi all,
>>>I'm doing some tests for a simple router architecture which have to
>>>perform differentiated service between two kind of flows.
>>>When I use a Queue element and a RatedUnqueue element in this way:
>>>SimpleQueue(32000) -> RatedUnqueue(X), where X is a certain rate
>>>value, even if the tester emission rate is <=X, the queue
>>>always overflow, causing a lot of packets to be dropped. I use 64
>>>bytes packets.
>>>I have two question:
>>>1) Why the click in my machine not allow me to fix a CAPACITY
>>>parameter value for the queue greater than 32000 packets?
>>>2) Why the RatedUnqueue element seems to not work correctly?
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>click mailing list
>>>click at amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu
>>>https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click
>>
More information about the click
mailing list