[chord] Using the research implementation

[Ivan Santarelli]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Frank Dabek wrote:

> Using lsd is really your best bet. Unless there are things that lsd
> provides that you won't use (some of the alternative routing protocols,
> maybe?), it's not clear that you will end up with a smaller executable.
> Try strip'ping the binary: most of that data is debugging symbols. The
> file is 6.6MB stripped.

Great, I just used
# strip -s -R .comment -R .gnu.version lsd
and the filesize now is about 3.3MB!

I think I will follow your hint, just wondering if linking directly the
code (instead of interacting with lsd via RPCs) could result in a more
efficient way to use the DHT abstraction. Are the RPCs used only to talk
with the lsd server or also for node-to-node communications? (I am going
to investigate further inside the code...)

Thanks again,
Ivan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCZiy7eoqcljMWsKoRAvgMAJ9IoZMqd7DMVk+b4gs+oerTQS0Q5wCfbvUI
ntyNlG5gfn62dmTV2qZ1BhU=
=px8i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----