This is an electronic review form. Almost *everything* in the form is
significant and shouldn't be fussed with.


			SOCS96  Referee's Report

             Please return this report to kaashoek@mit.edu by Dec 9


Paper Number:

Paper Title:

_____________________________________________________________________
Place a number for each item below corresponding to your evaluation.
(5=outstanding, 4=high, 3=medium, 2=fair, 1=poor)

Confidence in your evaluation: 

Interest/Importance to SOCS: 

Quality of presentation:

Technical contribution of paper: 
_____________________________________________________________________
(5=strong accept, 4=accept, 3=maybe, 2=reject, 1=strong reject)

Recommended action for paper:
_____________________________________________________________________

Regardless of the recommendations, please state specific comments and
suggestions that can be communicated to the author(s):









====================================================================

Comments on this paper for the Program Committee, TO BE WITHHELD FROM
THE AUTHOR(S):







---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Referee's name: 

Referee's affiliation:

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++